Friday, January 31, 2020

The furies


Been riffing on aspects of women’s anger recently. I was asked to contribute a personal essay to an anthology and duly pitched what I thought was a fairly straight forward story. It had all the juice – a turf war, a love affair, state politics, a dead girl. I don’t want to go into the story itself here as the collection is kinda embargoed pre-publication. What I can write about is the process.

The project Gracias 2.0 emerged out of my latest writing job, as I needed some light in the pretty interesting places I’ve been lately. Media attention focuses on angry women every now and then in history but it’s usually when they’ve mobbed the streets with pitchforks placards to demand rights that the other half of the population take for granted. Anyway, I felt that this demonstrative anger is pretty well covered, as is #MeToo. What I wanted to write about was a series of events that culminated early last year and resulted in my feeling healed of a decades-old beef.

While collective women’s anger is a sight to behold, individual female anger is seen at best as unattractive, at worst hysterical. It’s seen as distinctly non-maternal (unless you are defending your child from bears) or unfeminine. We want to be liked after all.

I remember saying to a lover that I couldn’t verbally hold him to account for lacking the courage or inclination to tell the truth about me because “I want you to like me.” Instead I internalised my wrath in a perfectly presentable shit storm of self-harm. How ladylike, Sarah Toa. I’ve been turning away from rage lately. Anger, pointed in the right direction and for the right reasons, is a powerful change agent, but there is so much of it spraying around at the moment I feel it’s often unproductive and provokes pointless anxiety. I can feel it in my gut when I’m on Twitter.

In the midst of all this I am writing that piece on women’s rage. I wrote one version of the essay. Then I wrote another. I wrote a third but that one wasn’t very good because I’d been drinking gin. I went through myriad ethical decisions. What about her family? How can I build a story on her death and not have the story become the Dead Girl trope? How do I criticise those people and not let them off the hook? How not to include my family? It was excruciating.

I rang the editor, after she noted that my submission was five days late. “I’ve lost my nerve,” I told her. “I used to be so brave.” I explained my ethical dilemmas and she stepped through them like any disciplined philosopher. She then said something really surprising. Her and the other editor were discussing that very morning how difficult many writers in the collection were finding this topic. She had almost the same conversations as the one she was having with me.

How bloody interesting, I thought. Writing is a lonesome pursuit and a witchy one too. Sitting for hours with a brief to create trouble and toil can be a tough gig. To write a personal essay on anger is to do a Lazarus on old grievances: they arise out of the ground quite fresh. Then of course, they have to be dealt with. People don’t tend to feel rage towards a tree or a rock or a dog. It’s generally a hominid, so the ethics and libel horrors show up. And women’s rage isn’t pretty, as I said. Staying staunch and strong in a literary depiction of injustice requires refined rage. So those three things – reliving trauma, ethical choices and overcoming gendered expectations. In a room on your own. Writing is hard.

Anyway, just thought I’d pace that one out here. Thanks for walking with me.
Ps. The essay is in.

9 comments:

  1. Anger is exhausting. I have noticed that women's anger often ends in tears of fatigue, which is how I end up feeling after an impotent outburst of rage.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sometimes it is so long suppressed that a final outburst is exhausting.

      Delete
  2. Wow, this is timely given my own new year's resolution to take no prisoners. Even Tom's comment above highlights the judgment of women's anger as 'futile'. Yes, I can see how it is and am guilty of this very often and it IS exhausting. BUT, and it's a BIG BUT, as I said in my 'Fuck the Patriarchy' blog - we no longer have the luxury of niceness. Niceness is what has allowed men to ride roughshod over us for bloody millennia. Women are warriors too. Why is it OK for a man to be angry but not a woman. Male anger is seen as a strength, yet even in Tom's comment 'women's anger' is a weakness. FUCK THAT. I go back my mantra: What's the intention? Go back to Sumeria and find the female warriors. There is more than gender stereotyping at stake here.

    This is an excerpt of something I wrote years ago. Sorry it's so long:

    'During my research I struggled to access ‘adult’ conversations about what the myth of the hero and the descent into the underworld means for women. I am aware of the myth of Persephone and have even painted myself as that character, however I find most female versions of the hero archetype completely unsatisfactory. All they do is perpetuate a model that has been around since the early Greeks, keeping the feminine trapped, submissive and eternally waiting for some strong brute to emancipate her. Well it isn't too hard to guess what I think about that.

    Therefore, perhaps I should be grateful, instead of angered, that even Joseph Campbell admits there is a ‘paucity of scholarly analysis of the accepted feminine archetypes’ (Powers, 2000: 3) But if a giant of a scholar like Campbell has ‘missed it’, and upon being pinged for it continues to ignore the issue and doesn't do the research, then there seems to be little hope. In his ‘definitive study of heroism’ (Hero with a Thousand Faces), Powers thinks that the ‘subliminal implication is that heroism….is possibly only for men’. (Powers, 2000: 3) Unfortuanately my own research backs this up. Grrrr.......

    Something even more sinister lurks beneath this particular piece of 'accepted' wisdom. Powers also says and I agree with her, that there is a disturbing absence of a ‘discernibly autonomous heroine’ and that this absence can be attributed to the long established tradition of equating divinity with heroism, and therefore masculinity. As a female of the species I have intuited this and it is difficult not to feel insulted by the lack of effort by scholars to tackle this subject, especially when the female psyche makes up slightly more than half of the world's population. Powers goes even further to suggest that because the task of finding a way to divinity occurs through the archetype of the hero, it is ‘theoretically impossible’ for a woman to realise the divine. It would seem therefore that the theory needs some serious adjustment, is long overdue and I
    am about to do it in my thesis (I never did of course because it would have taken me into another thesis).

    It is not difficult to understand that these omissions have come about because it is men who have done most of the theorising. It appears that even men who are trained to think beyond gender find it difficult. Sorry boys, I remain unsympathetic, and, in truth, very disappointed. Powers suggests that ‘the process of manipulating archetypes in the service of the goals of patriarchy is much older than Jung’. (Powers, 2000: 6) We all know that it goes way back into early Greek culture.'

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sorry, in my ranting I forgot to say that I love this post. And also that we need people to stand up and speak, we need women to challenge the patriarchy, the misogny and the inequity. Bad shit happens when good people stand by and do nothing. I know it's a tough gig, but if you channel the anger and frustration into something that can wake someone up it may bring about positive change and won't be a waste of energy. There is strength in tears, in compassion. I'm not a Christian but I like Jesus for getting really mad and chucking the money lenders out of the temple. Why? Because IT WAS THE RIGHT THING TO DO. I think we have become shy of having discussions around ethics but they are sorely needed - and not in any 'religious' context. Just look at what is happening atm in the USA and even in Australia. Truly disgraceful. Go getum' Sarah (but I'll understand if you decide not to).

    ReplyDelete
  4. I've heard that criticism of Campbell's work before.
    How's this for a quote:
    ‘Women have their place in bikie culture, but they can’t become members,’ said a prominent bikie leader. ‘Females have no culture of things in common. There is no clan of women in history except in the myths of the feminists. There is no single value around which women can build anything in society.’

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. OMG that quote is so bloody rude and dismissive. But entirely predictable, which is why I have no respect for bikies.

      In my research I always came up against the same issue - the inability of the majority of the male population to empathise and look at things from a female perspective - including some very smart men. Or entertain the idea that there may be a different way of looking at the world in any real sense. It's infuriating. What hope is there for the planet? In my experience masculine psyche is ultimately about dominance, control & 'penetration'., which extends deep into the planet (mining) and out into space. My own father once said to me: 'all men really want is to impregnate as many women as they can'. Which means we are fucked.

      Delete
    2. Here's a good one Sarah. When I was still living at home as a teenager my Dutch grandfather showed me a picture in one of his pretty-out-there-for-the-70s porn books (which btw he never attempted to hide all that well), for confirmation that the woman in said photo was actually ejaculating. He pointed to the photo in which he interpreted the white line on the door jambe behind the woman as evidence that women were just like men and ejaculated during orgasm. Now I haven't done the research and know this is accepted among some folk but the point is: it was obvious he was so keen to prove that women were JUST LIKE MEN, vis-a-vis the 'right' women really want sex all the time and men don't need to treat them any differently to the way they like to be treated re sex. Which, if you think about is, is pretty funny cos it's kinda gay - that some men want women to be like men. Oh yeh, I forgot to mention that this was when I was 15 and hadn't even HAD sex myself. Why did he imagine I would even be able to relate to this topic? He didn't - in his typically fucked-up male-riding-roughshod-over-female mind this hadn't even occurred to him. Is it any wonder I am creating memes that fantasise about shooting the patriarchy?

      Delete
  5. Listen...

    This might sound a little weird, maybe even a little "supernatural"

    BUT what if you could simply press "Play" to LISTEN to a short, "magical tone"...

    And suddenly attract MORE MONEY to your life???

    I'm talking about thousands... even MILLIONS of DOLLARS!!

    Sounds way too EASY??? Think it couldn't possibly be REAL?!?

    Well then, I've got news for you...

    Sometimes the greatest blessings in life are the easiest to GET!!

    Honestly, I will PROVE it to you by allowing you to listen to a REAL "magical money tone" I developed...

    (And COMPLETELY RISK FREE).

    YOU simply click "Play" and watch how money starts piling up around you... it starts right away...

    GO here to experience the wonderful "Miracle Abundance Sound Frequency" as my gift to you!!

    ReplyDelete